BC or BCE? The BBC's edict on how we date events is AD (absolute drivel) - Telegraph
Some atheists reject the very existence of Jesus of Nazareth. But is this 4 B.C. – A.D. 65). Seneca was a Hayes' own book bears the publication date I'm an atheist but I'm happy to fit in with others and use the supposed date of JCs Most people use the terms AD and BC. BC was "Before Christ (was born)". Many people use the abbreviations B.C. and A.D. with a year (for example, A.D. ). We use this before a date to indicate that we do not know exactly when .
No, this article is about the deliberate perversion of historical data, along with the shoddy scholarship, that is characteristic of the atheistic community.What Does AD and BC Mean?
Their influence is so nil that one might be inclined to ignore them altogether — except for the fact that this circumstance affords an excellent opportunity to focus upon how these antagonists deal with the evidence of history. It throws a floodlight upon their character and their utter lack of comprehension relative to the legitimate conclusions that one may draw from ancient documents. Here is an example of what I mean.
Judith Hayes is an atheist. She is the author of a recently published book, In God We Trust: An apostate from the Lutheran Church, Mrs. Hayes reveals a vicious bitterness towards the Bible.
She is ignorant of the most fundamental of biblical matters, yet what she lacks in knowledge she compensates for with venom and crudeness. Paul, who was the real founder of the religion known as Christianity, barely discussed Jesus as a person, and made no references to his family.
Jesus must remain a puzzle, historically speaking. What shall we say in response to this reckless charge? This is lame logic indeed. There may be a variety of valid reasons which explain their silence.
Silence proves nothing — one way or the other. Note this concession from another atheist: Hayes has never personally examined any of these sources is a distinct possibility. The truth is — precious little material from secular writers of the first century has even survived to this day. Blaiklock addressed this matter in one of his books. Blaiklock taught ancient and biblical history for more than forty years, and was internationally recognized as an authority on the classical writings of antiquity.
In discussing the surviving literature of the Fifties and Sixties of the first century, the professor writes: Was he separated by time or distance from the events relating to the Teacher from Galilee?
One of the writers cited by Hayes was Arrian. Arrian was a Greek historian who spent most of his time in Athens but who also briefly served as a governor of Cappadocia. He was not even born until about sixty-five years after the death of Christ.
What is the Atheist term for BC and AD? | Yahoo Answers
He wrote some material regarding the ethics of the Stoics, but his most important work was his history of Alexander the Great Anabasis. I should stress at this point that I do not object because I want to vindicate the literal truth of the Christian religion — since I am afraid my faith is like a very wonky aerial, and I sometimes find the signal pretty scratchy. I object because it is all so darned nonsensical.
There is no Eran religion, and no followers of Common.
BC or BCE? The BBC's edict on how we date events is AD (absolute drivel)
There was Christ, and if the BBC doesn't want to date events from the birth of Christ then it should abandon the Western dating system. Perhaps it should use the Buddhist calendar, which says that it is the 2,th year since the nirvana of Lord Buddha.
Perhaps it should have a version of the old Roman calendar, and declare that this is the fourth year of the fourth consulship of Silvio Berlusconi. It could say that this year was 13, or whatever since the Big Bang, or maybe the BBC should switch to the Mayan calendar and announce that is the year 1 BC — before the catastrophe that is meant to engulf the planet.
But if the BBC is going to continue to put MMXI at the end of its programmes — as I think it does — then it should have the intellectual honesty to admit that this figure was not plucked from nowhere. We don't call it because it is years since the Chinese emperor Ai was succeeded by the Chinese emperor Ping though it is ; nor because it is years since Ovid wrote the Ars Amatoria.
It is years since the presumed birth of Christ.